Skip to content

The Senate is scheduled to consider the SAVE America Act this week. However, due to unified opposition from Democratic members and some Republicans, the bill is unlikely to advance.  The President, along with certain conservative members, has suggested that Senate Republicans utilize an untested parliamentary approach known as the talking filibuster to potentially facilitate passage of the bill. Minority Leader Thune (R-SD) has strongly dismissed this strategy, citing its procedural complexity, the extensive time commitment required, and the lack of sufficient support within the Republican caucus.

Instead, Republican leadership is preparing for extended debate sessions, which may continue into the following week. This approach is intended to demonstrate to their constituents the party’s commitment to advancing the bill and to place political pressure on Democrats regarding election security issues. Prolonged debate will require senators to remain on the Senate floor late into the evenings, minimizing opportunities for procedural maneuvers by the opposition. Leader Thune intends to call votes on amendments reflecting the President’s preferred changes; these measures are not expected to secure the necessary 60 votes. The bill’s most dedicated proponents have expressed an intention to pursue a vote on amending Senate rules to eliminate the filibuster, but this effort is also anticipated to be unsuccessful. Ultimately, it is expected that a cloture motion will be brought forward to proceed to a final vote on the bill, but it is unlikely to achieve the required 60 votes, thereby concluding the legislative process.

In the House, Rep. Luna (R-FL) has announced her intention to incorporate the SAVE America Act into the forthcoming FISA reauthorization bill. Given the high priority placed on this legislation by the President and the party base, additional members may attempt to attach it to other must-pass bills. Some lawmakers have indicated they may withhold support for unrelated Senate legislation outside of DHS funding in response.